Yes they had.
There were public give-outs of free breed.
Also free water from public equaducts.
They also invented the alimony payments to feed children.
Does not look like buckets to me…
Go back upwards to the comparison metrics that I suggested.
This isn’t a debate in which Century life is nicer.
If I could, I would leave this shithole 21st Century at any time and go into the future.
Oh, I agree with this, but history is such a beautiful subject/field, can’t help studying and admiring previous peoples, Civilizations, empires or tribes.
Now, where is my mega yacht?! 
Idk how the future looks, if only I could choose, I might do it, but Idk, I feel like my family is more important than any future society… 
You know what I meant
You made a joke about Romans and the savages. I made another joke.
All that to say, when the Franks invaded they slowly but surely pushed all the other tribes past the Pyrenees and Alps and secured their hexagone/ natural fortress.
It’s like saying because a tribe in what is now called Israel got invaded by the Romans, the Jews have lost a war in Israel thousands of years ago. The blue eyed people we call Jews today have never been there before.
Same land different people
Culturally, Romans were giants. Everybody loves them, I do too. Everybody learned from them.
I said I didn’t want to debate that many times man
Now, when the Romans eventually met the Franks, they didn’t get a re-do. It was too much to assimilate.
Haha, the Roman thought it was the apocalypse, the end of time, it brought a dark age lol
Hardly looks like the savages were being taught by the Romans
Also, just watched like half an hour from one of Le Gendarme series - haven’t watched them since I was a kid (i need to watch them again); French comedy is 10/10!
Lol
I’m pretending this Napoleon movie doesn’t exist. The team, the cast, the subject, I feel like they gonna do us dirty. If I thought they’d treat it with the same respect they would a piece of UK or US history, I’d watch it.
That’s the one genre we do well. I’m surprised you watch that.
Edit: Makes me think of Egypt suing Netflix over Cleopatra lol
No way they don’t try to subvert it, they can’t resist
Well, Bucharest was called Le Petite Paris a century ago, there was quite the French influence on Romania, from language (many loan words in the XIXth Century), to metric system, laws, culture, etc., so movies are not an exception, French movies, especially comedies, were (probably still are) loved by Romanians.
They don’t even do their own history right lol…
Yeah, who knows how they will portray Napoleon… And not only him.
I had a bit of hope, but when they said Joaquin Phoenix, I was like “Fck !”
Some actors play the prop up roles, Leonardo Di Caprio, Brad Pitt, Matt Damon, Russel Crowe and many others.
Or they take little known actors to create a fresh aura.
I see Joaquin Phoenix as the master of the dirty work, he’s a great actor or “asset” but look at all his previous roles and tropes. It might be a break in his career where he get that glittering spotlight but most likely it’s gonna be a corrupt, insecure mental train wreck and worst.
I don’t even think it’s payback because Napoleon didn’t like the Hollywood type of folks and a certain world order. It’s gonna be just business.
When your movie industry sucks, you watch your history told in a foreign language by the descendant of the enemies of the protagonist lol
But I guess if the Germans don’t complain about their portrayal, I guess we don’t get to either.
I predict Ridley Scott’s film will treat Napoleon with the correct degree of gravitas. If you look at Scott’s work, especially his historical stuff, he tries to give the main character a sympathetic portrayal.
I just checked Ridley Scott, I also checked the Trailer I guarantee you they won’t go too much in the reasons for the war and its objectives. Zero chances or even just Napoleon’s politics.
But I haven’t seen it yet
I’m basing my pre-opinion on previous patterns
I can make predictions in private, I won’t go too much about it here. They won’t dare touch certain essential subjects and people, it’s gonna be entertainment, movie length. So they’ll have to simplify and I know how it’s gonna look, same as the others.
No. You’re right. He’s going to re-make the first 20 minutes of Gladiator and splice it throughout the film. It will be about Napoleon’s ambitions, the loyalty of his troops, and the great successes and failures. As to the French Revolution and that being some propelling ideology, that’s going to be minimized. The Hollywood view is that Revolution was murderous excess carried out by fanatics, but a Napoleon biopic covering his rise and fall seems long overdue. Maybe the film will show Napoleon’s effect on Paris. Scott loves cityscapes.
Seems like it’s gonna be even more chopped off than I thought then lol
But hey, if they keep it 100% about the military stuff without going into ideologies without too much subtext and revisions, I’m good. But they’ll have to give some context.
There will be an emphasis on La Grande Armee, and surely the of toppling monarchs and aristocrats will be acknowledged as having an ideological purpose.
I think Scott will treat the ideals of the Revolution much like he did ‘the idea of Rome’ in Gladiator; the protagonist succumbs but the larger purpose endures.
Watch your PMs
Time to give/show Germany/Germans/German(ic) Sphere some Love, by putting Germany’s flag in the thread title.
OK…
A few questions for @anon61582445 and @JAAJ and for Anyone who wants to share:
What are Your Favorite Current Countries and Why?
What are Your Favorite Historical Powers (could be anything, city states if you want or some obscure tribes, whatever, these are your personal choices and likes) and why (you can skip the why or just leave it for future posts, whatever you want, no pressure 
)?
What changes will likely occur in this Century (or even further) and which of these changes do you look up to?
What things from the past should have stayed, but have been abandoned, forgotten or replaced?
If you could change history, would you do it and why?
What events in history would you like to have happened differently?
Is this timeline that we are experiencing good to you, I mean, how would you rate/evaluate our present time and how would you rate or evaluate our evolution as a species, especially in the last few thousands years?
Thank You and I hope you don’t mind the tags, nor the questions.
Baghdad, Babylon and Sumer
Brief Summary:
This city and the surrounding areas, including ruins of the old Babylon [(where the Western World has its Origins, another location being Egypt (and the Levant)], has a Magnificent History.
For Centuries it was The Heartbeat of (some of) the first Great Powers, then, later, it was the Capital of the Caliphate, where knowledge about all sorts of subjects dwelled, in The House of Wisdom, THE “Center of Learning” (centuries before, it used to be The Great Library of Alexandria), the place which housed the largest section of books in the world.
For Centuries, Baghdad was truly The Heart of The Civilized World (only rivaled by a few cities throughout the World, including Constantinople), being an unrivaled center of education, medicine, commerce, philosophy and science.
(Edit) Searching for articles on the influence of Babylon on the Western Civilization I found a simple introduction here:
(to be continued, maybe)
OK, back to more modern settings, and here we find a Country which completely reshaped Human Society (and no, I’m not talking about Britain, America or France, to name some of the most influential Countries of the last couple centuries), and that’s Germany.
Now, all these claims (we invented this and that), ALL The Big Players Claim They Invented or Improved Everything, but we should never fail to Give Credit, where Credits Due - And here’s an interesting clip (a short):
Disclaimer: I’m a fan/admirer of Roman Civilization, so please understand my willingness to present things in a certain light.
Also, please keep in mind that modern words, titles, rights, laws, identities and concepts do not apply to Ancient times, to Medieval times or to any other past Age.
Here is a Very Interesting Historical Fact that doesn’t get attention, like at all:
JESUS WAS A Roman! 
Think About it: the Political Power and Real Rulers of that Area in the First Century and for Centuries after was Rome, thus, in a way, you can say that He was Roman, although not a citizen, as far as we know.
Now, for those who think Rome equaled just THE Eternal City or the Latium Region or maybe Italy and/or a few Roman Coloniae, they/you are right, but only for a certain time period, since, after a while, after the Romans conquered all The Mighty Powers and Regional Powers of the Mediterranean (including Judea) and many other less civilized territories, after a certain time, Citizenship was given to all free men living in the Roman Empire.
That didn’t happened during Jesus’ time though, however, he was born and lived in an area that was owned by Rome, thus part of the Roman World and Society, thus by Extention, Jesus was Roman.
Again, for those who argue that someone was either Greek or Roman or Jew (or any other ethnicity/example), that was not the case, as many people identified with their Ethnicity, but also with their Roman Identity/Citizenship and later, all the people under the Empire were considered and considered themselves Roman.
