Want to know if by renaming the audios causes disturbance to the morphic field itself?
Will it lower the benefits or make it unusable to the user?
Want to know if by renaming the audios causes disturbance to the morphic field itself?
Will it lower the benefits or make it unusable to the user?
I have doubts about archiving files :) some manufacturers of energy products strongly discourage doing this (Eric Thomson, Divine Tools, other creators of similar products in the Russian-speaking space).
I try to avoid compression, and save all files to the cloud in a pure form :)
although perhaps Sapien is not so strict on this issue
This shouldn’t have to do with morphic fields, only audio based on other energies. With Sapien and with the purchased products never needed, but when you download and convert the audio, the can be changed automatically and sometimes you have to correct it manually because it is incomprehensible by mp3 players and so on.
Sorry if this is not related but I dont knownwhere to.post it.i dont have any notifications what can I do?anyone know?its inactive on this domain?
I even upload my Mp3s to Google Play Music and now Youtube Music which brings in two additional factors:
But I have seen no difference in the above cases vs playing the Mp3 directly on my Mac. So, as long as the Mp3 is NOT distorted - which is possible when you reduce the quality significantly, most folks should be ok. These are morphic fields and not Subliminals, so the bitrate, etc. should not matter as long as one is not altering the information in the audio.
Hmm dream said you can listen to the audios on youtube at 144p and it’ll still work. I would like to know how 320kbs… Etc would affect it.
Οκ fixed thanks