0 voters
What is the difference?
If you have some experience understanding the difference between the two, feel free to leave a tip.
If you have less experience, feel free to ask a question.
Thanks for participating
To me audios have more carried mass of energy.
Like you can feel a cold breeze
So you can feel the audio fields.
Mandalas feel more like tingling to me. Yet sometimes it can pull me in in its own world within my own world, if i put time focusing on it.
Audio feels more active. Like more of a mass and expansive.
Analogues to going to a major event like in sports/music, or entering a big city, and learning how to navigate and be in that environment.
Kind of paternal like too.
Mandala feels more passive. Like more constrictive and conscientious of the person.
Could imagine a good friend visiting your home and you’re both able to communicate what you would like to do, what are you thinking/feeling about, goals/aspirations, points of interest. Much more personal. But similar to Veh’s point in that they could also share all about their own world/travels with you.
Maybe more maternal.
I get a little tired after 3 or more loops with audio. My concentration kind of goes down too.
With mandala I could be present a little bit longer.
Some of my experience.
When I work with audios, I am always 100% convinced that the connection to the field is there.
When I work with the mandalas, as someone who is barely energy sensitive, and I look at the mandala, there is still always some doubt in the back of my head “whether the connection to the field has been properly established”.
Therefore, at least for the moment, I prefer working with the audios.
Mandalas are meant to be carried around all day while most audios are meant to be used few times a dau.
So, logically mandalas will be less taxing on energy body (some would say “weaker”) , and audios while “stronger” could be more taxing, because they aim to give you full effect even if you are exposed to the field for a shorter amount of time
I think a problem (frustration factor) with mandalas is one of scale. Sound passively fills the space around you. The mandalas are usually a picture in your pocket—and it might be an abstract picture at that. If you’re not lookin at it, it can go away. If mandala were a wall tapestry or a pattern that kept repeating-pillows, pictures, tablecloths, etc., then it might sink in better. I think a large enough sticker with translucent colors could be used to create a DIY stained glass window, which, if positioned correctly might allow some sun energy to infuse it (no idea) and give it a large scale that might create a sense of awe; churches have used this one trick for centuries.
My experience is that tend to feel the mandalas (not all) early on, then it’s more miss than hit going forward.
There are multiple ways to interact with a field. Sound and sight here are initial sensory points to place attention and connect.
If you think size/quantity matters, then maybe it does. But it doesn’t have to.
It’s not thought or belief. The sound is more engaged sensory experience. I’m sure the mandalas work, but the thread is about why people have different experiences. I’m just suggesting a way forward for people.