As far as fields are concerned, Dale coined the term and method, taught it to Sapien, and he improved it over the years.
The others who use the term “morphic field”? They claim they learnt it from their relative or some other weird claim. Also, you need to be able to go into epsilon state (etc as described in the course) and be trained in “conceptual” intention, it’s not some random person who can suddenly stumble upon how to do it.
The fact they use the word “field” or even “morphic field”? Obviously trying to eat in the market and being deliberately deceptive. Unfortunately you are too gullible if you think that creators magically learn these stuff by coincidence. What I’m saying is they may be using completely different methods and calling it the same thing.
Different methods = not morphic fields.
Do they work? Sure, maybe. There are many other methods that work on energetic levels. Are they effective? Are they truthful? Are they themselves deluded over their abilities? Time will tell.
Look at Programmed Intention. At least he isn’t deliverately dishonest. He straight up says that he is not making morphic fields.
Idolatry? Maybe more of just common sense. I trust creators who don’t claim to be making morphic fields because at least they are being honest. I won’t trust a dishonest creator simply because dishonesty stinks, and we know a tree from its fruit.