Let me blow your mind

The Rabbit Hole
#1

So here’s a thought that came to me a couple of months ago. FYI, I’m a software engineer.

  • You probably know that all computer software is compiled into series of ones and zeros. (machine language)
  • The theory of everything suggests that the entire universe can be described with a series of ones and zeros. (it’s more of a fact than a theory if you ask me)
  • You know many eminent people like Elon Musk find the simulation theory quite convincing.
  • you may have heard of the 2000+ years old Bible verse; “God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.”
  • Now, excuse me for this step, but just imagine human genitals for a moment. Do ones and zeros ring a bell?

@_OM might smile at this.
@Samurai might find something to rant about.

and I saw theology posts by the following users whom I’d really appreciate getting thoughts of.

@Septimus @Starlight @Bronyraur @SammyG @El_Capitan_Nemo

Btw, I’m myself very into the “God is all, the sum of everything.” theory. That being said, I’m not trying to describe God here, just the art of creation. Or simply a giant coincidence :P

7 Likes
#2

this is how Elon Musk got the simulation theory

126064080_973986386428547_8639631377903925816_n
126064080_973986386428547_8639631377903925816_n750×928 59.9 KB

11 Likes
#3

Someone will link one of these papers, OM linked the nature of 3 dimensional time, as well as some of these papers from this site. Other users referenced them as well:

I cant phrase anything else that is meaningful because im in the process of wrapping my head around the content of these papers.

7 Likes
#4

Haha :smiley:
I have to admit I thought of this ancient meme a couple of times reading some posts as well:

800×420 30.1 KB

9 Likes
#5

@MonkeyOwl That’s a lot of reading I’m happy to do. Just wanted take a quick break to comment on this part from the paper;

Astronomers have everything backwards;

I read somewhere that some astrologist are actually aware of it. They use it as a method I’m not familiar with.

Thanks for the link btw! Really interesting stuff.

1 Like
#6

Nvm

#7

Hi @Quad, allow me to be lazy and just respond with the link below (I don’t care much about the article, but only the strip).

Möbius Strip

4 Likes
#8

I know the strip, but honestly, I’m no longer impressed by optical illusions since I spent a fair amount of time studying them. Much like the strip, I enjoy contemplating on Tao/God/Creation to find patterns.

On the other hand, The papers @MonkeyOwl shared, are really convincing me the holy scripts might simply be the work of time travelers. I’m still just on the second one tho.

Btw, I’m happy to accept that we’re simply in a pocket universe with boundaries that can be transcended. : ))

1 Like
#9

Me neither. It’s just an analogy that I use whenever I find myself in front of “unsolvable” topics :) (even if they are perfectly clear in my inner world).

Yes, Daniel’s papers are awesome indeed.

Quite the same for me. It’s something that I conceive as breaking… the Möbius strip… again :)

3 Likes
#10

until this very moment, I really disliked the word “breaking” due to my order loving nature. But you just gave me a whole different perspective when I read it next to the word “conceive” as wordplay. Thought of it like breaking out of an egg. Bringing forth life.

You just earned a massive amount of appreciation and love. Like so freaking much. Enjoy it.

3 Likes
#11

and I refer to the usage of “breaking” in terms of spiritual growth. I had heard similar phrasing before,
judged all such teachers with hard feelings until just now.

1 Like
#12

For me, it depends which kind of order. There are many that I absolutely adoooore breaking with no mercy. Not gonna lie… I try to take it easy though, as years go by :p I mean, I try to operate more “subtly”, through irony and sarcasm (including many of my posts on the forum, to be honest).

That said, your thought of the egg is pleasant in this case :)

Yes, about this part: I really don’t excel in English, so I mostly pick up “random” words lol. I think I see what you mean though.

Wow… Freaking indeed but thank you :sweat_smile:

#13

:sweat_smile:

Respect.

As an ESL speaker myself, I think your choice of words was totally fine. It was me who picked up the alternative meaning of “conceiving” and associated it with a very personal perspective.

Many spiritual people mention breaking the boundaries to transcend -a pop culture eg: Morpheus in Matrix :P-, but I’ve always thought “naah, I’d like to think of it as climbing a stairway, breaking sounds destructive and I ain’t gonna let that into my system”. Well, nature does show that hatching is part of the process. Damn this forum is giving me a paradigm shift. :man_facepalming: :sweat_smile:

2 Likes
#14

I prefer the Holographic Universe theory.

Unfortunately, humans have the tendency to take this the completely opposite way, creating God in their own image.

Well… there is 0.5, 0.75, 0.9 too, if you know what I mean :laughing:

1 Like
#15

You may want to check into Kybalion
Particulary Law of Gender is in a sense about 0s and 1s
Law of Polarity also, Damn when I think about it all of those Laws are one Law.
Law of Polarity basically states that polarities are at their core the same thing, but with different “intensity” ie. Cold and heat are temperature, big and small are size etc. So 0s and 1s could be bytes or codes I guess? Honestly #Quad check on Kybalion, You will like it ^^

3 Likes