Damn, MAO u trying to scare all the brain users?
Lol, i rememeber my first brain stack being so long, lol now brain key replaces most of it.
5 Likes
I listen to single tracks and stacks, but the latter rarely reach the number of 4,
and more generally I stick to the dozen tracks played every day. Thank you.
1 Like
This 2nd point is indeed the truth. I know some people say they still work without feeling it,but every time I receive top results is when I felt the effects of the field heavy
4 Likes
Don’t worry. Reverse is also true, information needs to be understood, processed, retained. Active focused learning works, but repetition works pretty well on its own, spamming is quite viable if you do it consistently. Like with plain subliminals even. And if you prefer repetition for learning, it’s actually more suitable method.
1 Like
so I was watching this video about the latest disney movie flop and at 3:55 he points out who makes these modern movies. and it makes so much sense. they’re men pretenders
and at 7:05 he goes off on them again lol
6 Likes
They have been doing this in movies for years.
The “stupid” or “dumb” male or dad that mucks things up “all the time”.
It’s in advertisements too, the dad floods the house or has a minor car accident.
Repeat programming of incapable, inadequate, incompetent males.
13 Likes
I even get my muscles sore from this audio, all over soreness.
1 Like
Im guessing you’re not watching the Barbie movie =}~
1 Like
I mean, to be fair, Shakespeare was doing it as far back as 1606 with Macbeth
3 Likes
Does this field in anyway reduce prolactine level or inhibit secretion of prolactine.
2 Likes
I was gonna ask this earlier lol nice question.
It should in theory at least have this component to balance GH secretion and receptor sensitivity cross-talk, but probably not to a large extent. So if you have higher prolactin, you better do something else. High prolactin in isolation is very safe to treat with cabergoline, which is often prescribed for this purpose. Below the reference range you will start getting lowered immune system response and this will be noticeable.
1 Like
How does that make sense ? How is it “fair” ?
(1)There’s a difference between satire and mockery
(2) She is talking about an open and concerted effort to emasculate man, which if you’ve paid attention would know is a goal of many social institutes, movie maker and writer in our generation for political purposes which coincide with social and legal changes(the use of the words “emasculation” and “gender role subversion” are cliche at this point) you mentioned one artist from the 1600 which again, is just one artist, doing mostly satire a instead of mockery.
If you want to compare Shakespeare’s vision of masculinity with the mainstream in the last 10-20 years, please do. However woke Shakespeare may have been it’s not very genuine to compare it to our current social shift.
You can have different political opinion and perception, I just don’t think Shakespeare’s Macbeth is a “fair” argument. Not even close.
Special cases vs generality
The impact of art and culture from the 1600s on children and society would be deemed archaic and bigoted today, that why we “needed all this progress” to change things to what we have today.
1600s culture and societal expectation about gender vs 2023… nah.
Lastly she never said there were no subversive elements back then. We can even argue that Shakespeare’s was so subversive that we remember him till this day for his impact.
If you google “gender role subversion” and add whatever you want you will find that by their language the contemporary “researchers”, writers and producers of arts (we ought to call them propagandist) admit their desire to manufacture a change to the status quo and bring a new dynamic in a conceited way. The openness is due to them bragging about their achievements. If you need years to “subvert” (their own words) something, you can’t claim it was already like that before.
In fact they have new terms like “modern audiences” which they keep referring to, suggesting that the new people need new content, however movies and tv shows have dropped in ratings over the decades and these artistic industries have seen their profits drop during booming economies due to audience rejection despite the marginal cost of distribution nearing zero…
Did I mention the ESG score an important criteria in the line of credits requirements from major companies include social engineering goals meant to push for social agendas fighting traditional genders norms and perceived patriarchal elements ?
Not even Apple can do without a credit line, the bigger the company the more vulnerable they are as their operating cost and the delays between capital investments and payrolls can last a while before projects bears fruits and income.
It’s technically as per the law in most countries including the USA an unfair lending practice (it’s recognized by governments as too much social influence), but what interest us is the incentive structure to push the agenda which wasn’t the case before. Companies including marketing agencies and studios executive have ESG score offices to boost their ratings based on progressive social values directly tied to gender roles.
Movies use tropes, a simple analysis of those tropes will reveal the messages being pushed overtime.
13 Likes
Yes, Androgens are known to inhibit prolactin secretion from the testosterone and DHT, it should be noticeable. On top of that since prolactin production is stimulated by estrogen the included inhibition of aromatizing enzymes which prevents the conversion of testosterone into estrogen will take care of the rest.
The modern imbalances in estrogen in males are due to aromatization, males produce little estrogen directly.
21 Likes
Macbeth is a tragedy, and it’s obviously about people you should NOT imitate, I don’t see how it’s a mockery on men, it’s about where the lust for power can take you and the remorse that comes with committing evil deeds. If you make an argument for macbeth, why not make one for lady macbeth too? She’s extremely manipulative and ambitious, easily more than her husband, doesn’t look like a good example of femininity to me. The difference is that Shakespeare makes it obvious they’re the bad guys and you should not be like them. When you read old stories, remember the context within they are written, I doubt shakespeare even remotely cared about influencing gender roles. And for the love of God, don’t try to fit them in a modern narrative, they’re good as they are
last post about this I don’t want to turn the manly man thread in a shakespeare thread of all things
1 Like
It’s not a fair argument, I was pretty drunk when I wrote that. I only meant that it isn’t a new idea.
3 Likes
Have we yet sensed any correlations in the woman’s project?
@Rosechalice
I don’t quite understand the question, I’m not sure others will
mind explaining ?
1 Like
I retract my question
It is possible to produce successful movies with a restricted budget of like 30 million (Sound of Freedom) and even less, but it takes wits and soul to do so. There is no need for companies like Marvel, Disney, Lucas Film etc. to resort on credits.
2 Likes