Lately the art of Dreamweaver has had a significant increase in power and detail, I feel that this being represented in the art encompasses the complete essence of the project, communicates elegance, balance, beauty, grace and at the same time: power, determination, control, being unlimited and unrestricted, a divine being.
20 Likes
So is the reason that more info is hidden, is that when info from other projects is shown and made known, it is proceeded to be used word-for-word in other projects as well?
Isn’t the rest of the same actions enough already?
such actions, are they of any benefit to anyone?
2 Likes
Aesthetic details and procedures are often reused several times, are not something original or subject to monopoly,
it is a completely different project, universal procedures, which can be integrated into different alchemies. A small part of a largely alternative design.
Elements from previous projects have often been used, starting with “the face nft” , which has lots of same elements from the nft “Adonis”, and the prince has similarities as well.
Cannot be monopolized, and dont really make a difference in the overall alchemy and end scheme
Most of these that are also in Adonis (skull symmetry, neck/posture, eyes etc, maxilla), i think is the first released Beauty NFT - june 2022, there is a whole section about pushing forward the maxilla, and jaw improvements
6 Likes
These are not aethestic details, rather they are explicit use of material. Then this calls to question, if they don’t make a final difference in the end product, doesn’t it deter away from using it in the first place? The simple act of inclusion, implies value.
To use the same wording, approach, and mechanism is not what anyone thinks of when elements of other projects become subject to be reused.
There is rather, an unnecessary move.
But it becomes necessary within a pattern, doesn’t it?
Redesigning a replica was the goal of the Face NFT, but let’s not go there. The initiators of the project know best. Adonis’ features were never announced or made a thread for, thus it remains in absence from the shared content knowledge.
I chose to address only the NFT in hand. Let it remain the precise way. 
4 Likes
And
Here as well about multiverse:
Isn’t it the same?
It is not actually, a complete different thing,
If anything this is from Venom
Personification + multiverse
Description mostly hidden, in the shared one there is nothing stated about it
guys please, you cant claim every word
this project covers some things other projects did, but its obviously different and super creative
10 Likes
This says, if hypotethically existed an Olympian God version of us, this Suit takes from it some of that essence, but also creates the end result of what our peak divine being would look.
It is based on the theory of the multiverse , you are claiming monopoly on the word? lol
6 Likes
Awesome project man, wish I had it lol
Congrats to you and the team!
7 Likes
Yep and in multiverse it definitely exists, as a result you get God Version which is basically the same thing
Your God version ≈ Your Higher Self version, playing with words. Transcendental Being
1 Like
Also you guys must remember that Dream made it, with all the knowledge possible about every other project made by him.
15 Likes
Venom has an ability called Parasitic Inheritance, meaning if he bonds with any given being, it learns all the unique skills of that being:
2 Likes
What is the part about GREEK GOD that you are not seeing?
1 Like
Also the Stand speaks of “host” in the description, a word used in the Venom presentation, should i claim monopoly ? lol
The stand is indeed similar to Venom even if Venom came first (some people also made me notice this in private time ago)
But they are from completely different overall designs and alchemies
7 Likes
This 
The projects might have some similar or same words or descriptions but the alchemy created by Dream will be different for each project.
8 Likes
Yes, please let’s respect that. And his work, above all.
9 Likes
Words are not to be claimed, sure.
Extensive use of material, however, is a different story.
Inspiration is the reason we have a host of projects today, but the one thing that has remained frowned upon from the very first day is: using the same material and techniques between projects.
Before we have this countless amount - people would ask before including anything for it was made to be special for the released product only.
Be inspired. But expect a public concern when the thread beneath the layers introduces the exact identical reference of other projects.
1 Like
Perhaps…but only until one remembers that Dream is the architect in the end , not the person who drafted the write up. Seriously, none of us really know which parts of our ideas make it to the final product and which is left on the cutting room floor. In the end, I’ve learned long ago to defer to the artist when it comes to his craft. And, I think you’ll agree that so far, Dream has not disappointed. 
5 Likes
It follows logic that if we add Dream to the conversation as someone we can all agree on, that it seems viable to add existing approaches; a free pass to do anything.
NFTs are not ‘managed’ by Dream. We all know that. Why? Because we are responsible adults, with supposed ethics and on a collective journey of development. It makes no sense that he would want to include himself in the smallest of details, and instead the Rules and guidelines are set by the community.
On the basis of Respect.
Respect to Dream is creating peaceful environments, adhering to his rules, and appreciating his work. Respect between NFT community members is adhering to the known rules that we have created ourselves.
Respect to Dream is creating a culture that supports doing what he loves.
This
Isn’t any of that.