This 
The projects might have some similar or same words or descriptions but the alchemy created by Dream will be different for each project.
8 Likes
Yes, please let’s respect that. And his work, above all.
9 Likes
Words are not to be claimed, sure.
Extensive use of material, however, is a different story.
Inspiration is the reason we have a host of projects today, but the one thing that has remained frowned upon from the very first day is: using the same material and techniques between projects.
Before we have this countless amount - people would ask before including anything for it was made to be special for the released product only.
Be inspired. But expect a public concern when the thread beneath the layers introduces the exact identical reference of other projects.
1 Like
Perhaps…but only until one remembers that Dream is the architect in the end , not the person who drafted the write up. Seriously, none of us really know which parts of our ideas make it to the final product and which is left on the cutting room floor. In the end, I’ve learned long ago to defer to the artist when it comes to his craft. And, I think you’ll agree that so far, Dream has not disappointed. 
5 Likes
It follows logic that if we add Dream to the conversation as someone we can all agree on, that it seems viable to add existing approaches; a free pass to do anything.
NFTs are not ‘managed’ by Dream. We all know that. Why? Because we are responsible adults, with supposed ethics and on a collective journey of development. It makes no sense that he would want to include himself in the smallest of details, and instead the Rules and guidelines are set by the community.
On the basis of Respect.
Respect to Dream is creating peaceful environments, adhering to his rules, and appreciating his work. Respect between NFT community members is adhering to the known rules that we have created ourselves.
Respect to Dream is creating a culture that supports doing what he loves.
This
Isn’t any of that.
I have already given the explanation regarding this, these are end results, a few sentences to explain the desired results, a few sentences on an entire scheme.
An end result for example isometric facelift, Bone reabsorption and skull symmetry, are concepts that cannot be exposed in a different way.
In any case I would have this thread for the testimonials, and if interested in pursuing this fact, can be done in pm, i dont understand the goal here
1 Like
Every one is ripping off blueprint of artistry and this needs to end here!!
lol
(PS the project is amazing! Congrats!! 
)
6 Likes
The word play is so fantastic it ended up being the same.
This is really all that matters
To me this is an Olympic divine being, completely new in my eyes :)
7 Likes
The introduction of identical material was presented to the public.
And likewise, I have also responded to you.
There are many ways, and countless approaches on how to approach the same topic
Yet the choice fell on using the exact words of another project.
That’s not right. And is not normally practiced. Such is the outcome of a series of uncalled for moves.
6 Likes
At this point, why keep milking the same ant.
Stop bone picking, skinflinting what was seemingly “your” NFT description(s).
Just enjoy what you have people . kanjuus makkhii chuus was so 2022
Speaking for myself too.
2 Likes
This is from the Enchanted PDF.
Man, the colony is huge and spreads wide.
No one is milking anything.
If anything, there has been a surge of innovation lately which is amazing to see.
But the seemingly remark quite doesn’t fit things here, There is no doubt that this is a copied description. Its out in the public. Much as there is no doubt the consolidation of idea is different. Personal responsibility is how communities are built. That’s how we show care. That’s how we redeem respect.
I just saw your posts.
Yeah it was a backward act and looks a like a verbatim copy and past move.
But other then a gut punch to confidentiality, someone tell me what is their to gain in ever sanctioning the general ideas of certain descriptions?
se noyer dans un verre d’eau
1 Like
Some project designs are public too, it wouldn’t be okay to reach for a set of qualities and include them as is.
Shared guidelines have been here since the beginning of it.
There are many projects with the same goal, they have all found other ways and modalities to work with. The new scientific approaches of human engineering have opened many paths to choose from.
It’s simple and we have been doing it for more than a year now.
No sanctioning. Just stating the very obvious.
1 Like
Was addressing en masse.
این بار اول نیست و این بار آخر هم نخواهد بود.
Not the first time people scrapping, and in all probability will not be the last either.
1 Like
I used to focus too much on description, but I got over it. I’m more concerned with the practical effects.
Any deviation in the context of the description will make the whole project different. Here’s the ancient Greek aesthetic, and the other one is the modern luxury aesthetic.
5 Likes