Idk, new strategies, no idea.
Like how they already invite anti woke people to Russia:
When rule of Ivan IV The Terrible ended, economy and population were on the verge of collapse, on paper it even happened, more than half of the agrarian land was abandoned just as an example, major reason was economic burden of Livonian war consequences. Originally it was a success, but ended with a Time of Troubles.
However, that’s the same critique we hold for socialist governments
They twist the natural cyclicity of the economy by using artificial boosters that push it in the short run, but are paid on long run resources.
You gave free money to people, gdp boost, production boost, consumption boost
Is it good?
Nah, even if you created them, the money, you haven’t created the resources consumed, which wouldn’t have been consumed without you altering the flow of the economy
And when you want restore the balance at the levels, previous of your intervention? That’s not the same economy anymore, there is an artificiality it should not be there, there weren’t any reasons of it to be there, and the path is permanently disrupted
Is it the end of the word? No, as we grow forwards, but we grow less than we should have if it was natural
I recomand Mises Business Cycle, it better explain this stuff 1000x times than me
This is true, but only from an Austrian Economics School POV.
From a Keynesian Economics POV, those artificial boosters make the economy work faster than without them, leading to innovation and wealth increase for all.
This is why most countries these days operate on this Keynesian model of leveraged debt and money printing.
So to sum it up, artificially boosting the economy is always a walk on the razor’s edge:
If it fails, the scenario that you have described happens and the future generation has to pay for it.
But if it works out, the economy is better off than before.
Not me binge reading dr Manhattan’s and Jaaj’s debate while eating dinner right now
I manifested this
A safe place from war
Not cool behavior at all…
At least, she owes the 67 Million people that voted for her a public speech.
If she doesn’t have the resilience to take a loss with pride and dignity, then she shouldn’t be president in the first place. In my personal opinion.
I fear that evil has grown to a level that people can’t bear to resist………
Nah. She can take a break. I think we’re all gutted about what’s going to come… on deeper level.
From my point of view, the position of the American president is one of the most important and most responsible ones in the world.
It is a position of such high responsibility that one cannot simply take a break as one pleases.
It is a position that requires super high levels of resilience and energy.
Hence why most people in the world cannot do this job.
If a nation cannot rely on their president during “hard times”, then what good is that president for?
And a lost election is not really a “hard time” in the first place compared to what a president has to potentially to go through…
Maybe someday in the future I’ll feel differently about this.
Maybe not.
And a lost election is not really a “hard time” in the first place compared to what a president has to potentially to go through…
As an American, this is a harrowing outcome. The response reflects this. It’s not a simple election as others pre-trump have been.
synopsis
US Election 2024 Results Live Updates: U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris will deliver a speech conceding defeat in the presidential election to Donald Trump at 6 p.m. (2300 GMT) on Wednesday, two sources told Reuters.
she’s expected to give the concession speech at 4pm EST (and not 6pm anymore)
the position of the American president is one of the most important and most responsible ones in the world.
That time has passed…
Money,Corruption and Greed are the factors now…Trump may not even complete a year, it’s Vance that they wanted to install, however Trump was the trojan horse to facilitate…
From an intelligence aspect, that will now be for sale
Always has been
Always has been
but without the Tech
What is so special about him?
Just asking, because politics is always about installing the people who are part of your network into positions of power. Everyone everywhere does this.
What is so special about him? Just asking, because politics is always about installing the people who are part of your network into positions of power. Everyone everywhere does this.
If history continues to repeats itself, how incapable must Man be of learning from experience
not sure why forum worships Trump