How? Where?
If you haven’t noticed, this is a discussion and everyone can bring in their arguments. Everyone is free to write here.
Are you trying to bring the discussion down to a personal level?
Almost all your sentences start with “you”…
Your original post did not address any of my arguments or added any new points or perspectives, instead, you simply repeated that Captain makes the final decision, which he does, which we all agree on and which no one ever questioned in the first place.
So it is you who comes in here, without any rational contributions, and uses this thread as a personal vent against me for… reasons…?!?
How? Where?
Spiritual means shadow work, means speaking about things.
Bringing things to the surface.
That’s what we do here.
While you proposed for the thread to be deleted, how spiritual is that? Ask yourself.
You know, various totalitarian governments through-out history also burned books because they didn’t like their contents. Instead of speaking about it. Again, if you don’t want to discuss something then don’t do it. No one forces you to participate.
But is this really so?
Everyone found and joined the forum when THEY where spiritually ready and open minded enough for doing so.
They used their free will to create an account and join the forum.
It is logical that not everyone will join the forum all on the same first day.
It is logical that people will join the forum on different days.
Which means that those who joined later, should, OUT OF RESPECT, check what the previous member have already done!
Instead, you are literally saying people were “picked by a randomizer and then a forum account was created for them”? How irrational of an argument is that? No one but the forum users themselves decided when they joined the forum and how much they have read and how much they have contributed etc.
Everyone here does everything by his own choice and it is not by some “randomizer machine” that decides about those outcomes. Everyone decides for themselves.
How? Where?
How? Where?
Even if would do this, it would still be true. Some users are more experienced than others. This is a fact. But in your socialist worldview this is not allowed because “everyone is equal in everything”, right?
I didn’t say this anywhere.
But even if I would have said this, this is another one of those socialist arguments where “everyone is equal regardless of their contribution to the forum”.
But no, people are not equal.
They have different levels of knowledge and did contribute different things to help others.
There is even a forum member level hierarchy, indicating how long a user has been on the forum and how much the person has contributed.
With these membership levels forum members have even different rights of what they can or cannot do!
And one can also earn badges here as an honor of achievement for contribution!
The whole forum has a built-in hierarchy with different levels, badges and rights, in case you haven’t noticed yet.
So no, this is not a socialist society where everyone deserves everything regardless of who they are and what they have provided.
People are different and no one should shame the fact that people are different. But this is exactly what you are doing here. You are trying to shame me and reframe me “as bad” for coming up with good arguments. I think your ego simply doesn’t know how to counter these arguments and that’s why you rant against me personally?
Anyways, I consider this statement of yours as debunked as well.
No one is bullying anyone.
Please stop reframing the whole situation.
Newcomers should read the forum rules and what projects have been created in the past. It is that simple!
You are literally completely ignoring all of my arguments which are me stating that it is disrespectful behavior of new members to not do research and arrogantly ignore what the forum community has created in the past.
You are a protector of the lazy and those who do not care about existing forum members and their past projects. Quoting here again for you:
And then again, with your argument and your logic, one could say
“Why is an experienced person teaching a new person something? He isn’t supposed to do that!”
– another common socialist tactic.
Following this logic, no one who knows something more than anyone else is ever allowed to voice their opinion?!?!
Do you see the mental gymnastics you are making here?
With that logic, no one should ever give any type of advice to anyone.
You are making a bunch of claims against me personally, yet you have not provided any rational arguments against the points that I have provided.
I am asking you again, to stop turning this discussion down onto a personal level and reframing this whole thread.
Because by doing this, it is indeed YOU, who comes in here with his emotional opinion (!) and without rational arguments and drags everything down.
If you perceive a regular discussion as “violent”, then the problem is really in your personal perception. I addressed almost all of your points to show you where you subjectively bend and reframe the situation to your personal liking.
So please, now back to rational arguments.
( I have read parts tho)