Absolutely. I understand your perspective. I like the thoughts you’re navigating!
Definitely everyone should test, experiment, and stick to what works.
I agree that clarity is important here, especially for the new comers and initiates. So to add some details:
I have not and am not am not suggesting that everyone SHOULD listen at zero volume.
Notice I said “You COULD listen to these tracks on silent… and the field will activate”. I am not suggesting this is a good strategy for most people, but as an objective example to counter the assumption that speaker quality matters. Putting the objective function of it into place.
What I’ve shared is an objective fact. It would be irresponsible to perpetuate statements that are subjective (based on the individual experience) as if they were absolute. But we do want everyone to have complete success!
Is it better to play with positive volume? For most people, it will absolutely help.
Is it required? Objectively no.
But if someone creates a subjective limit/bias for themselves they will of course need to overcome that. If the limit is “zero volume doesn’t work”, then the fix is quite easy: play with at least low volume.
If that isn’t working, play at comfortable listening volume.
I support this strategic process to get everyone maximum results.
how is a field going to work if the volume is at zero so its not coming out through the speaker?
Scalar waves and morphic fields do not rely on the power amplitude of the EMF of the track itself. You can see examples of this with the NFTs, Ritualis Totems (especially the Sapien collabs), and more traditional forms of field work such as druidic/wiccan ward stones and shields.
Ultimately the object, track, music, etc is a handicap aid designed to support us. It gets us the rest of the way there. The human mind benefits from an anchor to attach to, and sound is a glorious anchor.
Again, is it required? no.
Is it going to be essential for most people? Definitely.