Dear Dream,
I perceive my relationship with you as that of a customer and a provider of merchandise. I acknowledge that you regard your creations as high art, a perspective I respect. For the most part, I have been a satisfied customer and have refrained from expressing any criticism against you until now, including in the post immediately preceding this one within this thread.
What provoked your frustration with my last response? Am I not entitled to express a critical perspective based on my observations of this forum over the past few years? Consider your fan base: I believe that the efficacy of your fields and their functionality varies from person to person. Unfortunately, some individuals, such as the original poster of this thread, did not experience the outcomes they anticipated. This is a reasonable possibility, and I would not hold you accountable for failing to produce a universal remedy. Rather, the responsibility lies with those who harbored such expectations. You stated that you “can start throwing everybody under the bus.” This remark does not reflect the conduct of a person of integrity.
What troubled me was the tendency of your most ardent supporters to assert that repeatedly engaging with certain practices—such as “looping this or that”—or overcoming “subconscious blockages” would resolve all issues and ensure success. I am convinced that this is not how it operates.
From a business perspective, this dynamic could be advantageous to you. I am not suggesting that you should embody saintly virtues—no one does. Were I in your position, I would value such a devoted fan base.
Individuals seeking the transformative potential of your fields are often inherently vulnerable and, at times, impressionable. This observation underpins my earlier remark: I likened this community to a spiritual equivalent of Andrew Tate’s Hustlers University. Many genuinely believed that purchasing your fields would elevate them to extraordinary levels of prowess—whether as supermen or superwomen. Since last year, you have noticeably increased the production of field-related products. Some individuals diligently save their limited income solely to acquire what they perceive as magical solutions.
The audio files and digital images serve as media through which your fields are transmitted and manifested. The magic, however, does not reside in the files themselves but in the interaction between the fields and the user. If my original post lacked sufficient clarity on this point, let this serve as clarification: I do believe that your fields exist and have an effect.
However, there is a significant caveat. From an outsider’s perspective, how might people perceive customers who spend hundreds of dollars on what appears to be a mere MP3 file? Objectively, Dream, this business model may seem dubious to those unfamiliar with its premise. As customers, we were purchasing your “magic,” yet in the eyes of the conventional world, we are frequently regarded as irrational. This dynamic is noteworthy, not only here but also in other self-help enterprises.
Additionally, I intended to highlight how Sam appeared overwhelmed by your abrupt departure and subsequent return. I wished to extend my support to him for maintaining the forum and website’s operations during your absence. Were I in Sam’s position, I would have felt utterly disoriented. I cannot comment on your accusation against Sam, as I lack knowledge of the facts between you. Moreover, how you are treated by moderators, general users, or Sam is irrelevant to how you should treat your paying customers. I trust you understand this distinction.
That encapsulates what I intended to convey. Incidentally, if your inquiry about my place of residence was motivated by an intent to send a gift, I might consider disclosing it to you. After all, our relationship has been strictly that of customer and seller, and I request that you do not impose any expectations beyond this. Thank you.
I wish you success in the next phase of your journey.
Sincerely,
kimchi
good to see you on here.