Man, I don’t want to post but I’m getting that push, ya know?
Divine timing. There was a thread where divine timing was up for discussion. I concluded that it was both no longer valid since the universe isn’t locally real and quantum entanglement is a thing, and completely fundamental because we have to actually be able to truly let go; it’s a helpful construct in that way.
Today, in the thread that seems to be “The Airing of Grievances” and “It’s just my opinion” incarnate (not invalidating, just calling out the vibe), @Kyle_Reese mentioned dowsing… and ya know, I think dowsing and divine timing are both necessary.
On an overly simplified level, dowsing is intuition with some extra steps. For me, those steps help elevate beyond any limiting beliefs, ego, and “i don’t wanna’s” (like this post). Followed strictly while remaining vigilant is a form of discernment. Divine timing then slots in for wisdom, discernment, and either ascending/integrating your ego (the magus approach), or transcending it. Between the two, you cover intuition, discernment, wisdom, and keeping your ego from running amuck. They also lead to others such as gratitude, detachment, acceptance, etc.
Do you have any idea how badly I want to be able to spam crypto trading fields and have them help me make myself a crypto God? Have them help me make Crypto Trading, or Trading on a whole, “for me”? But it’s not for me, at this time. I could force it, I may even be able to force it well enough to get by… doing so will likely deplete my reserves and keep me distanced from something that is part of my best path in life.
And so you get left with, as I see it for now, two paths. The path of surrender to what is most resonant with you as it becomes most aligned and available - the path that allows you to nudge and yank a bit here and there as it’s not a very narrow path. Or there’s the path of dominance - the “I don’t care how many shape puzzles I have to break in the process, this square peg is GOING TO FIT in that round hole.”
Both are valid paths. Hell, both can probably get you where you want to go. One is probably a better fit per individual than the other and I don’t believe them to be interchangeable or ad-hoc; if they are, they’re “seasonal” or “for a time” at best imho. Both come with their own set of difficulties and challenges and both can be deeply rewarding… the issue is when we look at the outcomes of someone else’s approach and either undercut the value of our own path or try to force theirs. This isn’t just big stuff either; this is as simple as realizing your partner “ordered better” than you and has the tastier food on the table.
Simultaneously, I can advise someone who’s decided for dominance as much as I want but yeah, all my advice leads to “surrender”. The things that I’ve experienced working best for me are surrender-focused; though that discounts the nearly 40 years of a sort of weird passive-dominance I was unconsciously attempting prior to this.
I suppose what I’m attempting to say, in my corner, to anyone listening in is this: Accept your path or change it. Those are always your choices. If what you’ve got going on isn’t working for you, change it. If it is, stop comparing, even if it could be better. Yes, in a perfect world you would be the supreme alchemist and time, matter, nay, existence itself wouldn’t matter - and I truly believe you can get there, but it’s a journey.
In other news, I’ll be losing access to this after April. My financials have changed and I’m scaling back subscriptions again. Be blessed.