Science and Technology

2 Likes

Mark Twain :roll_eyes: you’re the nupson / fool verbigerator echolalia snowclone. Arguement? Okay quibberdick.

How original. Hollywood. Bollywood. Never can think for yourself can you?

Ă©pater la bourgeoisie #enfantterrible

Had to sleep on it Philip. Treppenwitz. L’esprit de l’escalier (Esprit de l’escalier)

Honestly, infra dig and all didn’t want to bother with some schmuck who private messages me "i hope you don’t watch porn before you go to sleep when I tell them about brahmacharya.

Speaks volumes of who you are really. But here you can come to my final far secco qualcuno. Anagnoresis denoument of this drama.

And Tony stark has an ego/pleionosis?

'm laughing at you not with you.

So leave it my makebate batebreeder. Tacenda

bonne journée

Philip,

  1. You’re 27. I just turned 19. Who’s the biggest loser?

  2. You literally/kyriolexy left the PM chat yestreen/last night? Forwhy moving the goalposts again.

  3. Being a mome/nitpicking critic , bashing? Enantiodromia of a timeserver huh. You called me a genius for my age when were discussing with qualunquismo all the masa bodoa of the masses and mokita of koyaanisqatsi of our dirigiste society and its poshlost .
    Sbottonarsi, I had the zivilcourage told you that I chose a path to become celibate, and practicing hart ducha of brahmacharya orenda - tashinamu being a nullimitus. But then you got all aposematic/warning me away through your tirrit and began to philippizewith offensively forward/petulcity of (quasi biga-peula) trying to have implied that I never loved a woman before and kept up with how I’d be a zoilus/envious of other guys, anhedonia/never be happy cuor contento , always as the outcast/byspel etc. Attaccabottoni much?
    Nonsense.

  4. The only deleted posts were those of using fancy words like you having to be an animateur in helping you understand my altiloquent word-grubber ventose windbaggery of: “exeleutherostomize”, “amatorculist/amoorete, cavoli riscaldati” “razbliuto” “anteric”, “anagapesis”, “et hoc genus omne” vocabulary you kept saying was annoying and failed to understand with your midas-eared hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia.
    No need for the trampling dumfusion. You were jargogled, so I had to water it down for you witling! Why be an abydocomist and drag on this yoin/remora bobbery.

Now don’t be one to be constantly chiding/nagging nudge -snool (or should I delete that word too?) and just let me go help a friend nail a physics exam.
Here I am wasting my time hammering away at a glibido subvirate cumberworld.

So keep taking it out of context, fissilingual fabulist.
Maybe if you’ll flip to the index you’ll find the ultima Thule of today’s loser?
And speaking of loblogic farpotshket context you’re supposed to be a full grown man

Natheless, don’t do yourself a disservice paper tiger; so argal stop with this vagient/crying like a child spuddle/ attending to trifling matters as though they were of the greatest importance. Trying to achillize with character hatchet jobs, zowerswopped all being out for my scalp. Enow with being a snoutband clatterfart. Caseate with your schoolyard insults.

ephemeromorph?

McCarthyism Iskhabibble

Get a life dude.

Enjoy your winter snowflake. Au revoir.

1 Like

Just as for the cognition of an object distinct from me I also need an intuition in addition to the thinking of an object in general (in the category), through which I determine that general concepts, so for the cognition of myself I also need an addition to the consciousness, or in addition to that which I think myself, an intuition of the manifold in me, through which I determine this thought; and I exist as an intelligence that is merely conscious of its faculty for combination but which, in regard to the manifold that is to combine, is subject to a limiting condition that it calls inner sense, which can make that combination intuitable only in accordance with temporal relations that lie entirely outside of the concepts of the understanding proper, and that can therefore still cognize itself merely as it appears to itself with regard to an intuition (which is not intellectual and capable of being given through the understanding itself), not as it would cognize itself if its intuitions were intellectual

3 Likes

Tf did I just say

3 Likes

You want to be intuitive? Should try Image Streaming Josh.

1 Like

No habla ingles

2 Likes

Vibration audios doing the things

Ill play superhuman genius 24/7 for a month and come back read this.

3 Likes

Superhuman Genius x Dual-N-Back = Super Genius

Press Start To Begin. :sunglasses:

1 Like

http://www.rexresearch.com/1index.htm#aether

http://www.rexresearch.com/1index.htm#longevity

–I think I might be finding where some of the previous field ideas are from :thinking:

1 Like

https://fractional.art/

Perhaps buy a fraction of NFT! :D

Certain number of fraction would be created

You’d need a specific amount to work

And then purchase it

And if you want sell whenever you’d want as a token for as much as someone’d buy. And keep enough for yourself.

Nothing to see here.

Majority of “ideas” listed there that we find fields made by Sapiens are simply things for which there was a need existing anyway

Is like going to a restaurant and be surprised the menu has “chicken soup” just like Mr Pedro has at his restaurant :hushed:

:woman_shrugging:

Is not like he is being copying.

But maybe there are other things he could make from there lol and make them great or better

1 Like

Yeah man haha

I was having a laugh here.

Not but seriously there are cool things listed there perhaps you could tag Mr Captain ;)

See if something picks his interest

1 Like
1 Like

The function of the cut is to enable the constitution of the subject through separation with the Other—we will come back to this point in detail. This separation has a prerequisite: the first sequence of the constitution of subjectivity, which Lacan calls “alienation” (Lacan, 1998a). Upon meeting the Other, the infant is exposed to language: in responding to his cries and behavior, the Other names him, he refers to him. In this exchange, the infant comes to realize that in order to become a subject, he must use what Lacan calls signifiers (characteristic of the symbolic order)—they are the discrete elements of language considered as different sounds, independently of their usual socially determined meaning. In particular, the infant gradually sees that in order to interact with the Other, he must endorse the signifier through which the Other designates him, called the primary or master signifier (S1)—the future object of primary repression. Lacan calls this operation â‰Ș alienation ≫ not only because the infant, generally speaking, receives the discourse of the Other through his speech, but most importantly because in this encounter with the Other, he receives a specific signifier S1, the assumption of which conditions his existence for the Other, and in particular communication with him. The signifier “functions as a signifier only by reducing the subject in question to being no more than a signifier, to petrify him in the same movement it calls the subject to function, to speak, as subject” (Lacan, 1998a, p. 207, mod. tr.).

New study on bioelectricity and aging - https://osf.io/wkhx4/ - yes, Michael Levin is one of the authors. Really exciting research is done in his laboratory.

2 Likes

Researchers have discovered that senescent pigment cells in skin moles can stimulate robust hair growth, challenging the belief that these cells impede regeneration. The study showed that molecules osteopontin and CD44 play a key role in this process, potentially opening new avenues for therapies for common hair loss conditions.

The process by which aged, or senescent, pigment-making cells in the skin cause significant growth of hair inside skin moles, called nevi, has been identified by a research team led by the University of California, Irvine. The discovery may offer a road map for an entirely new generation of molecular therapies for androgenetic alopecia, a common form of hair loss in both women and men.

3 Likes

https://web.archive.org/web/20191030000555/http://www.stephenjaygould.org/people/richard_goldschmidt.html

1 Like