Sacarsm yes, mockery no.
No, I am killing the whole idea behind this thread with my general stance on the matter.
Also, being Jewish is hardly a matter of religion, hence the “non religious jews” that’s how they call themselves and according to many sources, there is reason to suggest that most jews are non religious. Atheism has been popular in Jewish circle early on. Being Jewish is an identity and is associated with genetic differences in most cases hence the prolific genetic testing in Israel and other ethnic policies whether in community organizing or reproductive matters. It’s an interesting topic in genetics.
Beyond the sarcasm were ideas, what I’m saying is that this imaginary thinking (specifically this brand) is a big part of the problem. Too focused on desires of cosmic peace and justice, drama usually follows also it’s vague and easily manipulated. This line of thinking is responsible for many of our current predicaments.
Also not sure people get what the ego is, it’s our primal survival mechanism.
Survival comes first and then you build spirituality on it. We should transcend our ego to see beyond our homo-sapien nature.
There are real advantages for some to make wars, that’s why war happens.
That’s how I see my reply (joking)
Still most of us would rather learn from rationality than experiences accidents and war. It’s good to have common sense.
Well the USA had real plans to use their nuclear advantage first, which they would likely have used. American scientist took it upon themselves to help the soviet to create a balance of powers. MAD (mutually assured destruction) is hardly an enlightened realization. It’s an equilibrium between egoistical thought processes. In fact warfare as merely adapted to proxy wars, economical warfare and cyber-warfare in the meantime. While they are all busy trying to create nuclear shields.
I don’t want to go over all the smaller arguments, that’s why I use sarcasm. Out of laziness, not mischievousness.
I don’t think the line of thinking presented here is grounded in reality at all. It’s utopic, unconcerned with details and likely to turn horribly wrong in practice. Especially since these talking point have been coopted by the power that be to suit their agendas.
I do admit that I joined this conversation because I was a bit cranky a couple hours ago. I should have kept silent.
Edit: I do regret the tone