Now I’m even more confused. 

Gotta spam Alien Intercession and Angelic and Dragon, damn, I’m all for being saved lol.
I’m gonna negotiate my saving.
Alien Bros, Do you need a cook?
I can learn lol.
Read: “Assume it’s all bullshit, unless it resonates, then just reclassify that specific part.”
Well, good thing I’m perseverent then lol.
I think i am worthy, no matter what lol.
Alright, enough internet for today.
btw, this incredibly well respected biologist said he is on-board for the idea that all matter is cognitive at some level.
keep in mind he distinguishes between cognitive and consciousness
Michael Levin has own channel with much more content for general public https://m.youtube.com/@drmichaellevin
thank you
very interesting stuff
Are animals conscious? Some scientists now think they are
…
No s…t, they were all plastic figurines.
What kind of title is that?
No words.
What a frightening title for an article… we shouldn’t be asking questions like this.
Hold up, what the title actually means is that scientists are beginning to potentially consider being open to begin thinking they may be, in some unexplainable ineffable way that has eluded us since the dawn of time.
Hold your horses young man, science needs lots of time to develop properly xD
This is because most of these scientists are not really conscious themselves.
Literal NPCs.
Non Player Characters.
A non-conscious individual cannot recognize the consciousness (the soul) in other things.
We are gonna free those NPC scientists from the matrix’s grip, one by one… ![]()

i do not agree with the NPC idea
How could you possibly know whether they are conscious or not?
I think you have misunderstood my generalized statement and computer game analogy.
Every being has consciousness.
From an external perspective, beings whose thoughts and behaviors are almost completely didctated by the programs in their subconscious minds, appear as “NPCs”.
Beings who have reached a certain level of conscious awareness, self-reflection and free will have become actual “game players”.
This is all relative and depends on the perspective of who exactly is actually looking at who:
From our human perspective, animals and plants appear are NPCs.
From our Higher Self’s perspective, we as incarnational fragments may appear as NPCs.
From the Source’s perspective, our Higher Selves, may appear as NPCs.
…and so on.
Even as an analogy it feels incorrect ,
the label NPC lacks compassion, since we do atrocious things to npc’s in video games without a second thought
it is a label i see used to justify compassionless behaviour
In a sense you right about this.
Thinking about how animals treat plants.
How humans treat animals.
How Gaia treats humans and animals.
How some alien species treat humans.
How some Higher Selves treat their own incarnations.
Etc.
So where do we draw the line between protecting one’s own interests and between absolute compassion for others?
It is a hard thing to do in a physical world, where beings are separate from each other by game design and where everyone is fighting for their own survival agaist the forces of entropy.