Most probably.
@anon8601412 This is a Good Point.
Whatever notions we have, are limited.
4 Likes
Also, what if Void was/is the contemplation/dream of Consciousness?
A pause to recharge?
Lol
Damn, i have good imagination.
Or perhaps, the fear of Existence is Nothingness (itâs shadow), void, thus voila, the void appeared lol (I know, conventionally all things appear from the void, but what if Void is the product of Consciousness).
1 Like
Is it really that hard to conceptually perceive the irony of using language, a tool that presupposes that communication needs to occur among different parts under the constraints of space-time, and that humanity is separated into tribal genetic clans, to understand the source of being?
I mean, compared to this, the ones wrestling with math at least bridge part of the gap (but create another one in turn).
I suppose those smashing particles and exploring the quantum realm (until they go back to trying to fix formulae to everything to stroke their ego), are ahead of the curve.
The Shamans, the Magi, the alchemists, the hermeticists, they are already playing chess while others are playing checkers.
The end result is still the same ⌠it doesnât matter what or who actually truly becomes one with source.
3 Likes
Friends, Rocks, Country rocks, lend me your minerals.
Humans are Rocks!
Huge, moving rocks!
(And they are right, we do have minerals)
Mathematics is more than formulas 
Who said otherwise?
I have overgeneralized your words. But personally I find mathematics to be the most universal and conceptual way of thought.
You have heard the phrase we are the dream and the dreamer? I think it explains a lot of things
2 Likes
It is ultimately rooted in observation, math ends where singularity begins.
But thereâs nothing wrong with confining oneself to a spherical existence. Systems are predominantly built around spherical and elliptical patterns. So you choose the Demurige. Everyone has the right to choose what they want, including their personal limitations.
1 Like
Well, thatâs where I have to disagree, mathematics studies all things and dimensions unobservable.
3D is a tiny particle of math.
Who mentioned 3D?
Spheres and ellipticals mentioning made me think about it. But in general my words are same without attaching to notions of dimensionality.
By all means, share applications of math that extend beyond dimensionality, patterning and deconstruction.
I will study them with joy.
Well studying something will require a form of such expressions, especially anything physical/with application beyond pure thought. But in general anything that doesnât involve this process is unlikely to be expessed by brain at all.
Precisely my point. What is the anchor for the science?
f(x) = 1/x when x=0 leads to ???
Letâs then add consciousness to the mix
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02120-8
Functionality and end-results are not always the same.
Math is functional, language is functional, the âindividualâ is functionalâŚ
Infinity whatâs special about this formula?
Zero Point. Infinity is where math, to a certain point, collapses.
i donât align to any attempt to establish a master discourse.
thatâs still ego tripping.
1 Like
In what sense? We can study infinites, compare them, etc. And it will be still basics. We donât need zero elements in all sets.