Zero Point. Infinity is where math, to a certain point, collapses.
i donât align to any attempt to establish a master discourse.
thatâs still ego tripping.
1 Like
In what sense? We can study infinites, compare them, etc. And it will be still basics. We donât need zero elements in all sets.
The purest way to experience concepts as far as Iâm aware is to simply feel/know them directly.
I mean, sure, mathematics works well within the context itâs meant to be used, but like any language, it distorts the concepts it represents and wonât have the resolution to represent more exotic concepts.
At least this is my understanding.
1 Like
in other words, spiritual mansplaining.
1 Like
Itâs studies concepts regardless whether they can be perceived or not. In a sense mathematics is the purest way to express concepts possible.
In the sense that it cannot be applied outside maya.
It is a borrowing from a higher order of thinking to fill in a gap inherit to the function of mathematics.
Who in their right mind would try to explain ânothingâ.
It is an experience.
physicists
1 Like
Arguably one cannot experience nothing while human, expressing it is done easily in math. Itâs useful, albeit not physical.
The end of the individual is neurosis. Sooner or later, it will all fall apart if they dig deep enough.
1 Like
Well, youâre here, you have arcturian intercessions and aliens, why not ask their opinion on the matter, lol.
1 Like
? Still a human brain, human returns to human.
And any means of communication will involve âlanguageâ, what its atoms and rules are isnât necessarily same as our written text. Yet it will be language as itâs communication.
itâs still useful though, people are allowed to have MRI machines for diagnosis, all sorts of technologies that can be used to improve quality of life.
Well, thatâs a whole rabbit hole in of itself ⌠about our history and whether we are truly better off than our ancestors.
I read the modern consensus. But, more and more things are proving that most of the time, itâs ego-stroking tosh.
Like the whole clovis first conundrum.
I ultimately think it doesnât matter.
Itâs too complex to intellectualize from my view point. Either completely involved motion, or absolute stillness can serve as glimpses into that state of âbeing?â. However, as an individual, an identity, I canât describe it. Because it is not truly you or me.
Our egos will beg the question of whether there is any value in it if we cannot âpersonallyâ approach it.
And I think thatâs the whole point, it creates us unlike itself to better understand what it is ânotâ, not necessarily what it âisâ.
But then again, who really knows. As egos, we are attached to âcontrolâ, and âunderstandingâ is a form of it.
A conversation cannot occur without egos stepping in, because a conversation presumes separateness.
In our âhumanâ state of being, we can only âapproachâ infinity.
I donât think itâs something that can be âtaughtâ. You can plant a seed from that space, but itâs ultimately up to the individual to decide if they truly want to align with something âmoreâ.
4 Likes
They can use images, or give you an experience, or give you a direct understanding.
They are not bound by language, we are, in our fallen human state of being.
If they ever respond with âwordsâ, itâs because this is how âweâ understand things.
2 Likes
Images are âwordsâ, just a different language. Experience too, itâs neural signals. Infinity might not be possible to feel, but sure easy to describe, just writing âinfinityâ does it.
1 Like
Be really ambitious with the intercession fields.
2 Likes
Youâre confusing words with communication.
Communication is a function of consciousness.
Consciousness is not a word in its actual function. We describe it using that word ⌠to conceptualize it.
Consciousness is why you are not collapsing unto yourself although 99.9% of you is empty space.
1 Like