Always sounded like a sauce name to me but can’t figure out which.
Let me eat some pizza with extra samsara xD
2 Likes
It is getting aged and grated at this point indeed.
Isn’t looking very edible.
AI after I send the prompt:
3 Likes
What’s the field that goes like tun tun tun tunn
¿?
2 Likes
4 Likes
Patanjali was a dualist with an infinite number of purushas possibly existing.
I am one with everything, like a fart in the breeze.
Sublime wisdom is here. (Just kidding — it’s a random thought)
4 Likes
thanks man
2 Likes
Those are my pronouns, btw
2 Likes
Frecking psychics ¬¬
Hi there grated 
1 Like
btw what does this mean?
I’m so tired of my mind or reality glitches…I don’t know if I have like minimal dyslexia (moving a letter within a name) or names truly are changing out there, Mandela effect and all that.
But yeah in my reality Patanjali had a different name.
2 Likes
Oh, I’m just spouting off random crap because it’s what I do for entertainment.
A lot of people translate Patanjali into an Advaita framework because, after Shankara’s time, it was considered the only acceptable truth for the political benefits that it conferred.
Patanjali, though, is from an older tradition. It didn’t involve the dialectics of later philosophy, it was just yoga and samkhya. Work, and basic theory to match personal development. No thought of a singular self was there. He was a “Non”- Non-Dualist. Everything was relational from a common man’s point of view.
2 Likes
Alright then.
This was useful. Now I don’t like the dude xD
2 Likes
aww lol
He’s my hero. He keeps it real.
But anyways, many things change in history. With different commentaries, we get different ideas. Some take it back to Samkhya, some go forward to Advaita, some take a move sideways to Madhyamakya. A different gloss can move things in many directions. And, in 10,000 years of philosophy, it has frequently been the case that schools have been defined by how they talk past each other lol
I have no investments in doctrines. It’s always better to watch what people do rather than what they say.
1 Like
Lots of Brilliant Ideas/Views/Replies are presented in this thread:
https://forum.enlightenedstates.com/t/dont-want-to-be-party-breaker-but/5555/331
I need to fully read it lol.
1 Like
I need to read some Patanjali lol, All I know is that he wrote about Yoga, nothing else.
I do have a sample/semblence of an idea when it comes to duality and non duality, so the fact that you called him a dualist amazed me, as I’m used to monism or non dualistic type of thinking coming from Yoga/Yogic Background (but again, I do know that there were some extremely popular dualistic yogis or gurus, one of them from the 9th or 10 century A.D./C.E., if I’m not mistaken).
Also, except for a few Gurus/Yogis, I never remembered them, even if I watched documentaries or read about the (I usually remember something or someone if I study about it/him/her/them for a few times).
1 Like
That’s why I spout random things lol. I’ve been in deep research for quite a few years. I’ve seen enough, that just about every story has another side to it. And so, I bring a contrarian element.
My views shifted in so many ways over the years, I’m not attached to any system of doctrines. I only really care about the persistent reality that all systems attempt to reach.
I liked advaita when it helped people break into a new awareness. I disliked advaita when people used it as an excuse to cause harms that could have been avoided lol.
But, all real yoga is basically dualistic. WIthout dualism, the Telos/End is presumed from thought rather than attained in deed.
1 Like
The word union itself presumes an union of 2 things/parties, although maybe they are one, Idk, or 2 pieces of the same puzzle, Idk.
Anyway, I gotta go.
Sleep duties lol.
Good Night. 
1 Like
Good night 
But absolutely, unity presumes plurality — at the very least, duality lol
1 Like
That’s how I am too although with less knowledge than You or others.
Waiting to read theSpart s reply, then I’m good, sleep time lol.
1 Like
Maybe The Truth is Malleable, it depends who and how someone looks at it, and it changes according to our own perceptions and views (?).
Or it’s infinite, then it is all possibilities.
2 Likes