I think this is his last post:
3 Likes
Ah that clears it :)
Thank you!
I hope WealthyPhoenix is well wherever he is at.
3 Likes
Just a random collection of thoughts⌠Iâve been collecting ideas and reflecting on the past 15-ish years of my own question-and-answer research.
When I got started with meditation and had my first set of psychic experiences, I wanted to have it blend and make sense with the rest of the things I was learning in school (since it happened while I was still in high school). So trying to make conceptual ends meet has kept me on a somewhat compulsive track of research for a while.
The easy things to find are the New Agey things which jump to quantum theory and relativity to try and make sense of spiritual ideas. This generally doesnât work because scientific theory only provides a formal description of observable thingsâand, if it doesnât do that, it provides a conceptual tool for guessing about behaviors.
I could probably write multiple books about the sketchy concepts and thought processes that have gone into the development of relativity theory and quantum theory. But, to make a long story short, the New Agey ideas that get connected to these theories really only have a link because the theories represent empirical horizons. Relativity links to things that are either too big or too fast to observe directly, and quantum theory applies to things that are too small to observe directly (and is basically a form of applied statistics that guesses at where a particle may be). Hence (when you canât see whatâs going on) itâs easy to fill things in with your imagination.
So the common ideas for blending science and spirituality didnât work out for me, they all seemed too naive and ignorant. I had then gone in two directionsâa rationalist search and an empiricist search.
The rationalist search traversed the field of logic, mathematics, and notation. I had high hopes when looking at the works of Chris Langan and the CTMU, which would reduce everything to language. As a theory of formal languages, it definitely works. But, a bunch of highly contestable ideas are basically side-loaded into the theory right at the start and are taken as starting principles. Thatâs an effective rhetorical move, if you want to sneak in some unfounded ideas and then get people to accept them due to the robustness of the structure that has been assembled from them. But, I couldnât accept it due to his rather uncritical acceptance of Wheelerâs it-from-bit. --And so, my view of the rationalist side of things slipped back into a Carnappian pluralism (where the math and logic can be neat things to explore on their own, but they say more about our thought processes/ideas and less about reality).
**I then went to the empirical side. There are a lot of interesting ideas and writings from the likes of Ernst Mach and Pierre Duhemâthey, in fact, spawned an interesting group of people who were highly rigorous in their critique of mathematical theories and their related semantics. The electrodynamics of Maxwell and Heaviside (for example) are taken as the final word on electricity and magnetism by a lot of people. However, when closely analyzed, it is found they they gloss over unique empirical features of electricity. There are, in fact, newtonian electrical properties which donât fit well into Maxwellâs theory. These elements can be found in the work of Weber and Coulomb and have been explored also in some works related to Helmholtz, Hertz, Duhem, Tesla and Steinmetz. --The limits of the Maxwell-Heaviside approach to electrodynamics also have modern relevance to security concerns with our electrical grid. In the work of Eric Dollard, it is mentioned that our overly simplified mathematics for electricity has caused laziness in our engineering and we no longer have countermeasures to the âTransientsâ (aberrant harmonics in the electrical current)âas a result, we are more vulnerable to natural disturbances as well as EMP weapons. There are also probably connections between this and Beardenâs work on Scalar dynamics.
**This is important because a number of the contested/contestable ideas from electrodynamics were inherited by relativity and quantum theory and have resulted in potential blocks and mis-directions in contemporary research.
Anyways, these ideas basically bring back the Aether theories. Iâve even encountered a writer on Vedic physics who was rabidly opposing the new age ideas related to science and spirituality because they basically gutted Vedic thought and removed the range of dynamics that show up with the atoms and elemental properties.
So all of that was interesting to me. And, when I encountered the concept of morphic fields here, it seemed to bring it all together. If there is an aether and it has electrical properties that are influenced by spatial configuration properties, then it is the interplay of existing force-configurations and the imposed changes to those force-configurations that creates the dynamic image of reality that we have.
With basic properties like that, it becomes an anti-reductive paradigm. All of the forms stand on their own exactly as they are. Thereâs just more to all of them than I recognized at the outset of my inquiry.
I always have an ongoing paranoia about information that I may be missing or ideas that I may need to adjust. But thatâs a neat concept scheme and it seems to go full circle.
3 Likes
HOLY BASED
4 Likes
Except that, you donât want that. 
Me Neither. 
3 Likes
Well yeah, I wouldnât wanna be cursed lol.
3 Likes
How does one I even know that they are cursed?
How can the mind KNOW that someone or something else is the one causing âbad luckâ to them?
3 Likes
I dunno⌠it would probably depend on intensity and a sort of âresidueâ effect.
Sometimes shit happens. Sometimes shit happens and there was a markedly bad vibe before, during, and after. And sometimes things like that become recurrent.
3 Likes
Oh that makes sense
I donât think Iâve ever had that feeling. Maybe my intuition telling me something aint right but not some supernatural shit feeling off
2 Likes
I love when I read posts that I donât understand.
Your inquiry is High Level and it would take me years if not decades (probably far less with brain fields on loop) to understand what you wrote.
Keep going, My Friend, We Need Brilliant Minds and Brilliant Ideas and Conclusions.
2 Likes
I donât know if I would consider pranayama as a spiritual practice but it for sure is amazing
Meditation on the other hand⌠my mind never shuts up!
3 Likes
Meditation, especially to empty my mind, now thatâs Extremely difficult for me as well.
Trataka on the other hand is OK.
Iâll post a link.
Just looking at the flame for a few minutes and somehow emptying my mind, I find it easier than deep meditation, without an object of observation.
But, there are many types of meditation.
Focusing on innumerable things, concepts, thoughts, energy centers (chakras, etc.), Deities, time, space, people, objects, Yourself, NothingnessâŚ
3 Likes
Why are men sexually aroused when looking at female nipples, but are not when looking at male nipples?
3 Likes
Because they are sexually attracted to women and not men
6 Likes
Lol
I donât have a better answer.
2 Likes
Probably the energetics.
When the body develops, women actually begin as more yang. The activities from the central channel begin sooner and cause the body to develop. When men are developing, the activities from the central channel begin at a later time.
This causes the defining energies for women to begin at the top and to descend. For men, they begin at the bottom and rise. --This creates a defining pattern for the development of the body and the aura layers.
When the energy fields interact, the complementary opposites cause an increase in kinetics due to an ease of flows. If either a man or woman were alone, the defining polarity would be their own against a fairly neutral backdrop. But, males and females in proximity will have complementary positioned anode and cathode centers for the energetics. --This is perceptible even through images due to the holographic qualities of information in an energy field⌠I wish I had a better description for it, but it is what it is.
So, in that sense, men respond to women precisely because they are women 
3 Likes
I was thinking the following:
If you look at male and female nipples from the very near and zoomed in only on the nipple and areola, without seeing the breast tissue around it, then it is almost impossible to tell just from the picture alone whether the nipple belongs to a woman or a man.
But when looked at the breasts of men and women in a regularly way, i.e. with also seeing larger other parts of the body, it seems that 1. on average female nipples are larger than male nipples and 2. the additional visual information of the breast tissues around the nipple (male versus female) gives the limbic brain a context of whether to interpret the perceived nipple as a female or a male one.
So the nipple itself is visually perceived by the limbic brain as âgenderlessâ by itself, but in the visual context of the rest of the perceived body (relative nipple size and breast tissue type around it) the limbic brain receives context of whether see it as a female or a male nipple.
3 Likes
MaybeâŚ
The aura-layer thing applies applies to just about everything, though.
If an image is taken, it holds the energy pattern of the entire person even if the image is only of a part of them.
The ability to perceive depends on the elements in the observers energy body as well as the elements in the person observedâso thereâs massive room for variability. But the mechanism of arousal itself is basically âmorphic resonanceâ in the most basic sense.
Very similar to the static discharge from a van-de-graff generator
But not as concentrated because the aether doesnât insulate like common air and there are other structures that hold a charge as well (and cause a lot of the responses to be more diffuse).
The limbic system isnât really causal, and neither is the brain. A lot of the activity takes place in the more subtle energy fields. Things in the brain/body are mostly just taken along for the ride. --There is a capacity for 2-way influence, but the pliability of the more subtle layers tends to give them priority in terms of behaviors. I donât imagine that a person would be locked into what their limbic system is doing unless most of their energy body has ossified⌠but I guess most people are fairly ossifiedâŚ
3 Likes
How did it go from nipples to morphic fields
Anyways I can personally tell when itâs a womanâs nipple vs a manâs
Im pretty sure menâs are flat. At least the ones Iâve seen and mine lol
4 Likes
morphic = relating to form.
The form itself holds/anchors the principles, memory, and energy signature that identifies it.
4 Likes