I don’t know how this works, just my guess.
On the Hawkins scale of consciousness, 200 is the divisive line between truth and un-truth.
Most people cannot consciously, intuitively tell whether something is true or not. Hence why many fall for manipulation, dictators, etc.
I won’t summarise but e.g. the book power Vs force describes this well.
But Hawkins did suggest that the world would be a very different place if people could tell what is true and what is not. The “truth” can be muscle tested, muscles weakening as a reaction to un-truth, universally for everyone regardless of the person’s ideology, knowledge etc. But this is not something that is also present on conscious level.
Basically if it was, each time a politician lied, everyone listening would know. Each time you read an article, you would know if there is a lie in it. Each time you talked to someone, you would feel when there is un-truth spoken. Etc.
Again I don’t know how the field works, I have no idea, but this could be one approach.
And it would be a reaction to what is said being true or not, regardless of the person saying it truly believes it or not. In the hawkins approach.